Общественное животное: введение в социальную психологию - Эллиот Аронсон
Общественное животное: введение в социальную психологию читать книгу онлайн
В стиле, написанном для широкой аудитории, книга раскрывает то, что современная психология знает о причинах некоторых из наиболее важных аспектов человеческого поведения. Аронсон начинает книгу, цитируя ряд сценариев, реальных и вымышленных ― реакции на расстрел в Кентском университете, эксперименты в Стэнфордской тюрьме, четырёхлетнего ребенка, которому дали барабан, все эти примеры иллюстрируют разнообразие наблюдаемого человеческого поведения в реальной жизни. Остальная часть книги посвящена в основном объяснению того, как человеческие умы работают и взаимодействуют друг с другом, используя эти ситуации в качестве примеров. Книга охватывает темы, касающиеся причин предрассудков, агрессии и когнитивного диссонанса.
Jones, E.E., & Harris, V.A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24.
196
Favo, R.H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 204–242). New York: Guilford Press. Fazio, R.H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In A.R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler, &A.G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153–179). Hilisdale, NJ: Eribaum.
197
Fazio, R.H., & Williams, C.J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential elections. JoumalofPersonality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514.
198
Fazio, R.H., Chen, J., McDonel, E.G., & Sherman, S.J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 339–357. Fazio, R.H., Powell, M.C., & 456 Herr, P.M. (1983). Toward a process model of attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one’s attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 723–735. Favo, R.H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 162–202). New York: Academic Press. Regan, D.T., & Fazio, R.H. (1977). On the consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to the method of attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13,38–45.
199
Herr, P.M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106–1115.
200
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortion in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York: Academic Press.
201
Bierbrauer, G. (1973). Effect of set, perspective, and temporal factors in attribution. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. Цит. по: Ross (1977).
202
Ross, L., Amabile, T.M., & Steinmetz, J.L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485–494.
203
Ответы: стадион «Форбс» в Питтсбурге, Вильнюс и 4 июля 1826 года.
204
Jones, Е.Е., & Nisbett, R.E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In Е.Е. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
205
CM: Jones, Е.Е., Rock, L., Shaver, K.G., Goethals, G. R., & Ward, L.M. (1968). Pattern of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 317–349. McArthur, L. (1972). The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171–193. Nisbett, R.E., Caputo, C., Legant, P., & Marecek, J. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–164.
206
Storms, M.D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing the perspective of actors and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165–175.
207
James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology (pp. 314–315). New York: Dover.
208
Greenwald, A.G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618. Greenwald, A.G., & Pratkanis, A.R. (1984). The self. In R.S. Wyer & Т.К. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 129–178). Hilisdale, NJ: Eribaum.
209
Greenwald, The totalitarian ego.
210
Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
211
Longer, E.J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–329. Longer, E.J. (1977). The psychology of chance. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 7, 185–208.
212
Petty, R.E., & Brock, T.C. (1979). Effects of Bamum personality assessments on cognitive behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 201–203.
213
Markus, Н. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78. Breckler, S.J., Pratkanis, A.R., & McCann, D. (1991). The representation of self in multidimensional cognitive space. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 97–112. Brenner, M. (1973). The next-in-line effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 320–323. Slamecka, N.J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,4, 592–604. Rogers, Т. B.,Kuiper, N.A., & Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688. Klein, S.B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions ofelaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 5–11.
214
San Francisco Sunday Examiner and Chronicle, April 22, 1979, p. 35.
215
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, Т., & Solomon, S. (1982). The self-serving attributional bias: Beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 56–67. Arkin, P.M., & Maruyama, G.M. (1979). Attribution, affect, and college exam performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 85–93. Gilovich, Т. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7,1110–1126. Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–336. Breckler, S.J., Pratkanis, A.R., & McCann, D. (1991). The representation of self in multidimensional cognitive space. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 97–112. Johnston, W.A. (1967). Individual performance and self-evaluation in a simulated team. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 309–328. Cunningham, J.D., Starr, P.A., & Kanouse, D.E. (1979). Self
